NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




Tony HellerPLUS

1566

245

Back In The USSR

  - 3:40

Even climate modelers understand that their models are worthless scientifically. Yet they are being used to push anti-human political agendas.


0

0

0

0

1

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


662 Views

Uploaded 2 months ago  

July 30th 2021  

File Size: 40 MB

Category: Politics







8 Comments

Jeff

- 2 months ago  

Who decides who's an Expert ? Is it the one who can sound more convincing ?

Juxtaposition

- 2 months ago  

Expert advice is based on unambiguous, unassailable, reproducible, reasoned, and specific argument based on evidence. Expert opinion is opinion. That is a personal perspective, a bias, It is particularly important to dissect the basis of that opinion to correct for that bias. If the expert is not transparent with their bias, they are not acting in good faith of the intellectually honest actor.

CLJScheelar

- 2 months ago  

How do we stop these left wing “fear mongers”? The situation is getting beyond serious! COVID has near ruined a generation!!!!! Other than control, what is the upside?? I just don’t get it? I am 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

Gordon_Shumway

- 2 months ago  

The only good Communist is a dead Communist. Never forget that folks.

No Apologies

- 2 months ago  

Huh...that model looks suspiciously like the projected ChyNa virus deaths all the health "experts" used...weird

Mikeyh0

- 2 months ago  

If only a single prediction from these idiots had ever materialized, they could keep a shred of believability. But NONE have. I have argued with nincompoops who claim the heat is being trapped in layers of the ocean because one area in the South Pacific showed an increases of .9 C over a two year period or something. Some have claimed that I didn't understand CO2 because they claimed CO2 allows the heat from the sun to enter the atmosphere but then traps the heat from the Earth causing warming and I said that's ridiculous. Like a one way mirror or something. For years I have been questioning this crap but Tony has given all us the gift of his time to expose the truth. For that we are grateful.

SupporterOfRealTruth

- 2 months ago  

Energy from the sun reaches Earth by way of radiation. Heat can be transferred in three ways: conduction, convection and radiation. Radiation is the only way to transfer heat through empty space. The sun cannot conduct heat to the Earth directly because the two bodies are not in contact with each other. Convection is also impossible, as no medium connects the two bodies to facilitate heat flow. Instead, the sun radiates much of its energy as light of various wavelengths. Some of this radiated light is in the infrared part of the spectrum and reaches Earth as heat. Light in the visible part of the spectrum also has the effect of warming the Earth. It does this by penetrating the atmosphere and being absorbed by the land and water. Once the Earth has absorbed all of the energy it can hold, it begins to radiate energy back toward space. This terrestrial radiation is primarily in the infrared band of the spectrum, which is absorbed by aerosols in the atmosphere. These greenhouse gases trap heat and store up the surplus energy of the Earth's allotment of solar radiation. Eventually, even the atmosphere reaches thermal saturation and radiates waste energy back out into space.

GordonVigurs

- 2 months ago  

The greenhouse gases, like any other body in radiative equilibrium obey Kirchoff's law. Yes they absorb infra red, but they re-radiate every single pico-Watt absorbed. The error in the greenhouse effect reasoning arises from applying attenuation equations which apply to individual optical paths to uniform illumination. This amounts to a failure to correctly account for the energy flows. Hence we get energy flow diagrams from the IPCC in which 100 units from the Sun magically become 140 units at the surface. Utter hogwash.